SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marcos who wrote (103083)6/26/2003 9:29:52 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Sure there was cause to overthrow Hussein, sure there was .... there was cause to overthrow Somoza too ... there was cause to overthrow Reagan, and now as a direct result of performance in this PNAC line, there is clear cause to overthrow Bush

Hmm... I didn't know that Somoza, Reagan, or Bush Sr. were ever the subject of a binding UN resolution..

But nice try at avoiding the painful realization that, despite clamoring for the UN to be the preeminent authority in such matters, that when it issues an mandatory and resolution, the Canadian government doesn't hesitate to avoid any responsibility for enforcing it.

And that's what we're talking about here. The credibility of the UN as an international institution. If the UNSC is going to pass binding resolutions, they need to unite in making sure they are enforced. Especially when it involves WMDs and blatant imperialistic colonization of a neighboring state.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News