SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave O. who wrote (1292)6/28/2003 10:18:04 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) of 3143
 
I asked for stories, not speeches. Yet I would not dare deny others to make points here as I have, under any circumstances. That's why I launched and kept this thread un-moderated at all times. No one here should have the right to filter an open conversation so that it comes out just so.

Your story has an obvious theme, and it is personal responsibility. Yes. However, when fiduciaries set out to destroy you, brokerage firms and investment advisers, do you find that acceptable? The answer is simple: yes or no.

Back in 2001 the defendants gave away their defense strategy here, probably because they did not believe that someone planning to sue them, someone in possession of a mountain of evidence proving every last allegation - and many others besides - would speak out in public. No, from their view, someone in that position would finesse their evidence, play tactically, read Sun Tzu and be "wise," planning every step - because that is what they did. They miscalculated because their measuring stick is that of deceitful scoundrels lying to everyone, dishonest crooks fleecing everyone in sight. Therefore, they cannot possibly comprehend someone who is honest, makes decisions based on integrity where they might have made millions. They would call such a person many names - and they did - they would surely not understand, because their moral compass is leagues away from mine. In the end, that shall cost them.

I ask again: I have sued a $15 billion corporation, called them guilty of massive fraud. That's Schwab. Why no counter-claims? Mr. Berber is worth between $300 and 500 million. Why not sue me for libel, putting me in my place? The answers are self-evident: they are guilty, end of story, and the last thing they wish for is a jury to see the facts and then judge damages, compensatory and then punitive.

I stated here earlier I would not discuss my relationship with my former attorneys. And I will not do it. However, I shall say this right now about Herbert E, Milstein (SEnior Partner), Stevem J. Toll, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C.: they are no better than the criminals I have sued, and in many ways far worse, as attorneys owe duties of loyalty to their clients, and are held to a far higher standard than stockbrokers. I am sorry to say to all of you here that it has turned out that some attorneys are no better than the defendants. I am now taking action on that score.

My case I am now representing in propria persona. I drafted and filed the writs; I also am drafting and filing the appeals. No lawyers will be running my case at any time - that is, unless I have become a member of the State Bar of California before this is over.

We'll see how it all turns out. Now it's in my hands - and I wouldn't want it any other way.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext