Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: D. Long who wrote (2823)	6/29/2003 9:54:21 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) of 793845

It was tailored to legalize homosexual marriage. You know that's a hyper stretch from the far right. Something on the order of give those f***** privacy and they'll take marriage. Of course, it wasn't tailored that way. As the Times put it in its editorial today, the country has moved to accept the notion that homosexual sex acts are private and should be protected by constitutionally grounded notions of privacy. I'm using a broader umbrella to interpret it, which is a minority rights umbrella. The "politically craven" stuff is Scalia. Playing to the crowd. I'm going to post Dowd's column on Scalia. Exactly right on.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next