Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (103862)	7/2/2003 2:47:13 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Clinton was eviscerated (and still is) for an essentially private matter- I think a much higher level of evisceration is warranted when the machinery of the state are used in such a huge way, and possibly against international law, and in a way our own people would not approve of, had they had the facts. Contempt is warranted when one is lied to about a matter that concerns one. I never felt Clinton's sex life really concerned me (although I certainly don't approve of old men predating on young women- yet, I think no law and no degree of scorn will stop that- it appears to be the way of the world). The criticism of Clinton was more than relentless and still is, and yet the matter at hand in the Clinton administration was of much less international and domestic import that the one at issue now- unless you think sexual fraternization with a female is on a par with leading the greatest country in the world in to war, against the UN's approval, for less than compelling reasons (or possibly, by using a pretext of lies)- if you think that, well...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next