Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bridge Player who wrote (3102)	7/2/2003 8:30:36 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 793838

Not bigamy per se, I think. Marriage is a public, not a private, act. However, the same feelings that now cause gay private relationships to be deemed worthy of protection under the Equal Protection Clause will also apply to the legal recognition of those relationships. The push is for two-person same-sex marriages; I don't know who is pushing for legalization of polygamy. Though with polygamy a recognized practice in much of the world, I am not sure on what grounds it can now be barred. Couldn't a Muslim simply claim it as a practice of his religion?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next