SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation
CRSP 53.19-1.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Icebrg who wrote (8795)7/3/2003 7:43:19 PM
From: Icebrg  Read Replies (1) of 52153
 
Relative valuations.

I became so enthusiastic about the NBIX vs SEPR contest, that I
went back to pick up some more companies fighting in the same
weight class. Over the day the relation between the original combatants
has changed btw. NBIX had a strong day, which cannot be said for SEPR.

Anyhow, some of these companies are actually selling products.
Some of them might even be on the verge of profitability.
Like CEPH and CELG. All balance sheet data are from end of March.
A few of these companies have raised debt since then, but that
will not affect the valuation much, as the same amount is added to both
the debit and the credit side.


CEPH IMCL CELG ICOS SEPR
Market cap. 2.428 2.432 2.514 2.398 1.534
Cash etc. 547 229 257 304 481
L-T debt 860 240 - - 983
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
"Valuation" 2.741 2.443 2.257 2.094 2.036

AMLN NBIX OSIP VRTX HGSI
Market cap. 2.043 1.726 1.269 1.113 1.616
Cash etc. 264 308 354 680 1.452
L-T debt 66 5 160 337 503
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
"Valuation" 1.845 1.423 1.075 770 667



I might have gone wrong with a couple of 100 millions
on HGSI. They have it as long-term investment. Perhaps
it is not marketable securities, but some investments
in equity.

The question is now. How good a job does the market
do in relative terms? As the market is supposed to always
be right it shouldn't really matter which share one buys.
But I guess that most of you have fairly strong preferences
and opinions with regard to the above selection. What about
Imclone for example?

ICOS and SEPR have always the same valuation. ICOS have
"lost" most of their late-stage candidates. They have
only 50 % of Cialis left. SEPR has product sales, royalties
and a good late-stage pipeline. It is just the matter
of the debt. The more I see this, the more convinced I am
getting, that seen from a relative perspective Sepracor
is severely undervalued in comparison with its peers.
Catastrophes may well happen as a fair number of us have
experienced already. But that applies to most of these companies.

Erik
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext