SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kevin Rose who wrote (423438)7/6/2003 12:41:43 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
This is simply your opinion. A family unit consists of parents who love their kids, and teach them to grow up to be good human beings.

Dear me. It is not simply my opinion. It is also the opinion of Nature itself. As far as Nature is concerned, a family cannot exist unless the hetero scheme exists. That is just obvious friend. What so-called homosexuals do is simply take from the produce of homosexuality and fashion with it what is no family in nature at all. They fashion a literal perversion of nature.

There are many same-sex couples who do just that. Just because their sexual orientation does not fit your religious beliefs does not mean that they cannot be good parents.

Religion has nothing at all to do with it. Nature herself stipulates that without heterosexuality, there is just no such thing as family. A homosexual family cannot possibly exist in nature. What we see when so-called homosexuals adopt children is a plain lie concerning what humans are in nature. That is no mere opinion and we can point to humanity’s fundamental and objective definition in nature to show it.

Well, if by 'force' you mean 'force to accept the rights of same-sex couples', well, then, you're wrong. For one group of people to take away the rights of another group is not only morally wrong, it is contrary to the Constitution.

Homosexuals have no natural rights that flow to them as a result of their homosexuality. They do not have these rights because homosexuality is truly not an object of the human family. It is foreign to it. Heterosexuals certainly do have rights in nature as a result of their heterosexuality. One of these is the natural right to replicate, a right homosexuals simply do not have in nature. Society may grant “rights” to so-called homosexuals, but it certainly does not support the structure we objectively find in nature.

These forbidden rights include very basic stuff, stuff that is naturally afforded to other married couples.

Society merely supports itself when it supports heterosexual couples because every single person, without exception, is comprised of the fundamental object types that also exist within the couple. Homosexual “couples” has not part in this. That is why heterosexuals have rights and homosexuals do not. Society may grant homosexuals rights, but those rights are contrary to nature.

For example, many states prohibit both partners in a same-sex relationship from adopting the children…. I can think of no crueler fate for a child than to loss one parent, then lose the other because of religious intolerance.

Religion has absolutely nothing to do with it. Nature has everything to do with it. Society may grant homosexuals the right to adopt. But it acts contrary to human nature when it does. Nature only recognizes one family structure: and that structure has nothing at all to do with homosexuality.

Gotta run to bed (sleeeepy)...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext