SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 318.61-3.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pink Minion who wrote (6393)7/7/2003 11:05:35 AM
From: runes  Read Replies (1) of 25522
 
<<That's because the PC component was still ~50-60 percent and still growing 20-30 percent>>
...And yet, 10 years earlier, the PC component was more like 60 to 80%. So why wasn't that boom-bust even bigger?

<<That would mean the industry would grow with GDP. During the PC boom years it grew 5 times that rate.>>
...Growing with the GDP doesn't mean that there will be a one to one correspondence. Nor, for that matter even a simple linear relationship like 5 to 1.

It ain't just about the PCs, it's the whole technology growth curve. PDAs, networks, consumer electronics, robotics. When the economy is growing businesses and people are going to try out the new technology to see how well it works. But when times are bad the "experimental" (discretionary) spending is the first thing to go.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext