SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (423840)7/7/2003 3:29:55 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
Now BUSH is destroying OUR CHILDRENS' FUTURES.....WHEN WILL THE MADNESS STOP!!????

Some Fear Ruin for Head Start
See Disaster in Bill to Raise States' Role
by Lily Hindy

WASHINGTON - - New York Head Start officials fear that a bill pending in the House to
transfer control of Head Start funds from communities to the states will destroy the program,
particularly in New York.

Advocates of the program say the Republican proposal would allow cash-starved states to
merge Head Start funds with funding for existing state programs and would loosen current
federal monitoring requirements.

Regional Head Start president Ruth Neale said last week that the bill may "destroy Head
Start programs across the United States, but particularly here in New York," where Gov.
George Pataki has tried to cut funding for pre-kindergarten programs.

Head Start
provides
education,
medical services,
meals and other
assistance to
low-income
children under 5
with the goal of
making them
ready to compete
with more affluent
children when
they enter
school. It serves
more than 1
million
pre-schoolers,
including 49,000
in New York
State.

Supporters of the bill say it would simply improve a good program that has had no major
changes since its inception nearly 40 years ago. Parker Hamilton, a House Republican
spokeswoman, said sending the money to the states would help get rid of confusing
overlapping situations with state-run pre-kindergarten programs. But Neale fears that allowing
budget-strapped states to administer the money will result in reduced funding for Head Start
programs, as "states' priorities lie elsewhere."

"With the severe budget problems currently facing most states, [they] are not in a position to
administer something this complex and resource-rich at this time," Neale said.

In what has become a contentious debate, advocacy groups for Head Start have strongly
resisted recent attempts by congressional Republicans to restructure the program.

Early last month, the Bush administration released a report by the Department of Health and
Human Services showing that Head Start children had not been improving enough in
school-readiness. Soon after, the House Committee on Education and the work force passed
a Head Start reauthorization bill to the floor, saying its goals are to strengthen its academics,
require new teacher qualification standards, and allow states to better coordinate existing
childhood programs with Head Start programs.

The National Head Start Association, an advocacy group for the program, called the health
and human services report a "stale rehash of convenient slivers of information," and one of
many "desperate attempts" to gain support for the bill. Rather than improving the program,
the advocacy group says, the legislation will neglect comprehensive services, parent
involvement and overall quality performance standards.

President George W. Bush originally planned for all 50 states to participate, but in the House
bill eight states will be chosen for the five-year pilot program, allowing them to administer
Head Start funds. New York will probably be one of them, Neale said. Currently, Head Start
funds are granted directly to community groups from the federal government under the
condition that programs meet tough federal performance standards.

The bill requires that when states are given control of the funds, "the State standards
generally meet or exceed the standards that ensure the quality and effectiveness of programs
operated by Head Start."

Deputy Director Jean Davis from the Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County's
Head Start program is skeptical about this vague language.

"When it crosses to the state level, [the states] can create their own standards," said Davis.
"There are no guarantees. The resulting damage will be too much on the families."

Davis, whose commission runs eight programs in Nassau County serving 560 at-risk children,
says that without the strictly enforced federal standards, services provided will not be nearly
as extensive. She is particularly concerned about the quality of nutrition and health care Head
Start children receive.

In 2002 New York cut investments in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs, and this year
Pataki tried to do it again, but was blocked by the legislature. If New York is given control of
Head Start funds, Davis worries they will become a "pot of money" that will go to other
programs. States will be able to better coordinate Head Start programs with existing
pre-school programs under the bill, which its sponsors say will eliminate some confusion for
parents in deciding which is best for their children. Advocates are worried that parent
involvement, one thing Head Start prides itself on, will decline as its programs become
coordinated with other existing programs. Peter Chin, a single parent who has one child
currently enrolled in Freeport Head Start, is concerned about the pending legislation.
"Everyone feels comfortable with people at EOC Head Start. If states take over I think that
many parents will shy away from going into these programs."

The bill should be voted on in the House in coming weeks, and went through the
subcommittee and committee with approval on strict party lines. It may have a harder time in
the Senate.

Copyright © 2003, Newsday, Inc.
CC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext