I am having a great day, thank you.
Why don't you give up trying to attack me, or whatever it is you think you are doing, and try to explain that funny little comment you made about pollution mattering to "value of GDP"?
It seems plain that if there are two countries with equal GDP over a period, one of which has polluted all it's fresh water and ruined all it's farm land and one of which remains pristine, one could argue there are lot's of important things going on not in the GDP numbers, NON?
The only thing that "seems plain" is that you made a stupid remark and are now trying to cover up with smoke and dance.
There are a lot of "important things going on [in a country] not in GDP numbers" - such as literacy levels and demographics of the population, whether or not people are happy, and yes, pollution levels as well.
The question is, of course, why anyone would want, need, or expect, GDP numbers to show any of these.
And what on earth is "value of GDP"???
Why don't we skip Monaco, I country I know little about other than seeing the 'race'.
Give another example, then. I gave Monaco as an example to be compared against the US because it has no industry and hence no pollution. Comparisons should be easy for this bizarre theory of yours on different "value of GDP" for countries with differing levels of pollution, which you just said "seems plain".
So, tell us. Just how is the "value of GDP" different in the US and Monaco, or another country with no pollution?
P.S.: Learn to spell for crying out loud. "Its" and "lots" for starters...
P.P.S.: Is the use of "NON?" your way of showing you know one word in French? |
