<when it comes down to the voting booth next year, and some one has to pull a lever for Bush vs Dean/Kerry/Edwards, it really is no contest, is it?>
Lindy, I'll take the nearest thing to Utopia that I can find. While King George II's gunslinger "With us or against us" slogans aren't exactly my nice cup of tea, I like:
Kyoto CO2 signatories being told to take a hike
Companies paying dividends without tax
Saddam being ousted
Osama being chased up the mountains in Afghanistan
The Taliban being given a dose of their own medicine
Liberia being liberated
Uncle Al KBE being reappointed by George II, to fund the Empire
Tax cuts for the rich
Governor Gray being hung out to dry, along with the stupid Californians who voted him in
Mugabe's gang being given a financial flogging whitehouse.gov
The French terrorist state being ignored [though our heroine, Sabine Herold Message 19068320 might change that] Dyxlexics, note that heroine and heroin are two different things though both give a feeling of euphoria and both are addictive. Having one inside your head is legal, but having the other in your head is not.
If Bill Clinton was also on the ballot box, I'd choose him, though he wouldn't buy NZ lamb. George II won't buy our steel [huge tariffs]. Bill's a fun guy and really knows what's up and creates economic miracles and promoted Internet Al instead of David Koresh style religious wacoes. George is a fun guy too, but in a scary kind of way. But I didn't like Bill attacking my idol $ill Gates. So, on the other hand, I might have to plump for George II. Americans will have to change their silly Roosevelt law to get Clinton back in [unless Hilary gets in and she and Bill run the show again - that would be fun; it takes a village and she could be the global village empress].
Decisions, decisions.
Mqurice |
