SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (6747)7/9/2003 4:17:40 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 7720
 
I don't see how racial preferences for historically disadvantaged races are some sort of constitutional right, or even a natural right for that matter.

I don't either. And the SC put a stop to unequal justice for blacks way back when blacks were still called "colored." I can find no fault with that.

Preferences are inherently incompatible with equal justice and the Constitution certainly doesn't guarantee them or even condone them, at least not anymore. Affirmative action was a flawed way of trying to mitigate the original injustice. Even with the advantage of hindsight, I don't know what other approach might have been better. Once the correction was largely accomplished, however, as it has been, then that should be the end of it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext