Hawkmoon,
Re: Can you give me YOUR name and number??
Yes, via PM when you provide the name and phone # of your purported witness, or you can simply do a white pages search on the Internet. :)
Your reply is disingenuous, as usual.
For instance, the idea that the Pentagon was struck by something other than the AA77 is a well researched theory and worthy of investigation by the Kean Commission. Of couse, TTBOMK, the Kean Commission has no curiosity whatsoever about this matter. The book by Thierry Messyan and a multiplicity of sites available on the Internet, all conclude that there are vast gaps in the "official story".
Kyle Hence is a researcher you may wish to contact. Here's his contact information:
Organization:
9/11 CitizensWatch
Open Letter
July 1, 2003
To: Dr. Phillip Zelikow
Executive Director
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States
cc: Al Felzenberg, Communications
afelzenberg@9-11commission.gov
Bill Johnstone, staffmember
Dear Dr. Zelikow,
Allow me to first say how much I appreciate the spirit in which Chairman
Kean is approaching his task within the Commission. Indeed, as he has
said, "no stone must be left unturned"; the Commission must for
history's sake and for the victims' families sake follow all leads
wherever they might lead. I speak for many concerned citizens when I
express the hope that genuine accountability and a full accounting will
carry the day in the end.
After the last round of hearings Chairman Kean was asked by Bob Braun
from the Star-Ledger if the Commission had plans to take testimony under
oath from witnesses and officials who can resolve discrepencies and
conflicts in what has been put forward, for example by the FAA and NORAD
regarding the response or lack of response of our air defenses and the
actions taken, or not taken by the National leadership on 9/11; many or
most of whom had been warned by our intellegence agencies. Chairman
Kean in his response, left the issue open and was non-committal.
I am writing to ask for an update on the issue of taking testimony under
oath:
Have you since the last round taken under oath any testimony in private
closed-door sessions?
Will you be taking testimony under oath in the upcoming July 9th
hearing?
If not, do you have any intention of requiring testimony under oath from
any of the officials who were charged with providing for the common
defense leading up to the attacks of 9/11?
I look forward to your response to what I feel is a very critical
process issue on the road to creating the 'definitive account' of 9/11.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns.
Sincerely,
Kyle F. Hence
Co-founder,
911citizenswatch.org
kylehence@earthlink.net
***********
Re: Hawkmoon: "I will tell you he was quoted in several newspapers around the DC area. Take a look for someone who's account matches the one I told you.."
Was he quoted anonymously? If not why can't you provide his name? Are you playing games here?
-Ray |
