DON'T START THE WAR Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (25169)	7/10/2003 5:55:07 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (3) of 25898

The book by Thierry Messyan and a multiplicity of sites available on the Internet, all conclude that there are vast gaps in the "official story". Yeah.. uh-huh... What was his theory again?? If I recall correctly, Flight 77 didn't actually hit the Pentagon, it was a missile... The plane actually landed at Reagan-National and the passengers off-loaded and conveniently and quietly "disposed of". Claims the hole was too small for an airliner.. But doesn't understand that the particular "Wedge" of the Pentagon which the plane hit had recently been refurbished and hardened against blast effects and impacts, and that such hardening caused debris to take the path of "least resistance", namely being sucked INTO the hole the nose of the plane punched all the way into the service driveway between the B and C rings... Had that plane hit any of the unrefurbished parts of the Pentagon, the damage would have been catastrophic, both in terms of damage, as well as loss of life... Yes, via PM when you provide the name and phone # of your purported witness, or you can simply do a white pages search on the Internet. :) You first... Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next