SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (104518)7/10/2003 1:33:47 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Let's cut to the chase. George II, Rumsfeld, Tony and co were full of it. There weren't any weapons of mass destruction

They believed their intelligence services, who told them he had WMDs. The intelligence services of every European country AND the UN concurred.

It's now laughable listening to the serious questioning about weapons of mass destruction with suggestions that Saddam destroyed or hid them immediately before the invasion. Have those saying that lost their minds?


Precisely because it sounded so crazy, no intelligence service believed it. Therefore the logical conclusion was that all the WMDs that Saddam had in 1998, again as listed by the UN, he still possessed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News