SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (36032)7/11/2003 11:56:23 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (7) of 74559
 
Hi WFGodot, re mir, I cannot agree with you more. My commitment to mir was zero, my belief in mir was nil, and my hope was plenty, wish even greater than hope.

Oh, well, my marauding troops have moved on to Lukoil, to which I am committed, hoping plenty, and understand next to nil, other than:

(a) it will not likely go to zero, and
(b) it is cheap, relative to keeping a couple of hundred thousand troops getting a sun tan in the desert at a cost of USD 666/soldier-day (USD 4 billion per month for 200,000 troops, or, at 300k troops, then USD 444/soldier-day, which is definitely not a lucky number in Chinese language), which, in the scheme of matter and anti-matter, is less expensive than hiring that many Pricewaterhouse accountants to do the job of finding more oil and weapons.

So, bottom line, I expect Lukoil to appreciate against the effort in the desert, which is the same as saying I anticipate the effort in the desert will devalue against Lukoil.

Chugs, Jay
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext