WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3298)	7/12/2003 2:08:56 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) of 10965

Glenn, Here's another dictionary that I find to be most useful: onelook.com Take a peek at the R.H. side. The first 'quick definition' provides the crux: (candid) adjective: starkly realistic While Rall is starkly realistic, Krauthammer was closer to to being honest than usual in yesterday's column. His assertion, ". For liberals, foreign policy is social work. National interest -- i.e., national selfishness -- is a taint", comes much closer than he usually does to telling the truth. We invaded Iraq for the sake of greed. Not on the part of the American public, of course. (They are merely fed a pabulum of silly patriotic homilies.)But in order to satisfy the greed of the highest echelons of Halliburton, Bechtel and the Repuglican Party. Krauthammer sums up the situation nicely, if you read between the lines. 'There's no rake-off for the plutocrats in Liberia,' he says under his breath. 'So why should we bother to fool anyone that we are a benign nation? Nothing could be further from the truth. We have to stick to exploitation, that's what has made this country great!' -Ray

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next