Contrary to Earl's crazy charge, I am not a Zionist. I think the Israelis were nuts to start those West Bank settlements and their current mess was perfectly predictable. Did they really expect no reaction?
And US foreign policy is badly out of kilter. The Muslims are right when they claim it is heavily tilted towards Israel and against them. With the US Jewish Lobby, though, I don't see how that was avoidable or how it can be corrected. So here we are. It appears now we have a colony in the ME. Great. Why didn't we just stick our heads into hornet's nests instead? It would hurt no worse.
And I do believe that Emile Vidrine is a crazy, probably dangerous, anti-Semite and anti-black racist.
But do you believe the US gov't staged 911, as Duray charges? That a cruise missile, not a plane, hit the Pentagon? (Did you read those posts I made to Duray previously that he never answered detailing the evidence that says in fact it was a plane? Did you see Bilow's recent response?)
Do you believe Bush is planning a coup, as Duray charges? He can only get away with so much, even if he is inclined in that direction (which I don't believe). At some point the USSC rules his term is up and elections have to be held. Or Congress impeaches and convicts him. And the US military is reminded that its oath is to the Constitution, not to the President. And most military officers would be inclined that way anyway; at some point they retire, become civilians, and they know a democracy is pleasanter than a dictatorship.
He would also face the danger of popular uprising. Yeah, the US military could put that down. If it wanted to. The danger to the gov't is that part of it may switch sides and join the revolution, as has happened in many other revolutions. Look at the 1917 Russian Revolution for one example.
Plus George 41 and Barbara would be on a plane to see him. Barbara would slap his face for screwing things ups and George would deck him.
Maybe you ought to listen to both sides instead of just the conspiracy nuts. |
