Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (105047)	7/13/2003 11:07:45 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (4) of 281500

It's not unreasonable to hold the President responsible for the accuracy of what he says, especially if the results of those words get a lot of people killed. The British STILL ASSERT that their intelligence is accurate. The only thing Bush has to apologize for is deciding to include foreign intelligence reports in the speech. It was all of 16 words. 16 words that didn't provide any unique, or compelling, reason for going to war against Saddam (smoking gun), but were one more piece in the puzzle. 16 words out of the thousands that comprise this speech: whitehouse.gov 16 words you and the liberal demagogues assert is comparable to the Himilayas, while any objective person can see it's merely a molehill. Especially when the primary source of the information has not yet altered their interpretation of it. Why is it that liberals like yourself have failed to point out that British intelligence still believes that Iraq was seeking to purchase Uranium from Nigeria? Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next