Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mannie who wrote (22108)	7/13/2003 6:12:06 PM
From: elpolvo	Read Replies (1) of 89467

scooter- i'd like to hear what clark said. was it on tv? i'm pretty good with google if you can give me some hints i can probably find what he said within a couple of days when it's posted, transcribed or written about. It's a little late, but these guys are about to be questioned, hard. in my job i do a lot of work with elected officials and judges and attorneys. i was talking with (more listening than talking on my part) a judge after a studio show last month. he was saying that the initial reason for an investigation is rarely anything big or earth-shattering. the important thing is that once a formal investigation is begun, then all hell breaks loose because so many people are put under oath and asked so many questions that eventially something incriminating will turn up. he was talking about how ken starr investigated the whitewater affairs, spent millions of bucks finding nothing but eventually turned up an embarrassing sexual liason with an intern that finally ruined the clinton administration when bill tried to protect his privacy and his wife and his daughter by lying about the affair. as i wrote to karen, the uranium lie is a pittance compared to what else has been done by the bush team BUT... and this is a BIG BUT... if it provides the springboard to a formal investigation, all hell will break loose on this gang of fascists. there are hundreds of questions that will be asked... most were already asked by reporters and citizens and were either sidestepped or lied about by the administration. they can't do that under oath without being guilty of perjury or contempt of court. bring it on! you are about to hear the following answer hundreds of times, "i'm not at liberty to divulge that information because it's classified and is a matter of national security." eventually, some of the players will begin to squeal or slip up and impeachable offences will begin to be uncovered. meanwhile, the public will become more educated and the ballot box will speak loudly in 2004. good riddance. -polvo

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next