PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neeka who wrote (426322)	7/13/2003 10:05:01 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 769667

Talk about changing spots. It is very disturbing to most Americans how the left let an under oath blatant lie by an American president pass, but wants to crucify a president when he relies on intelligence information from US and British sources. Disturbing? What is wrong with you all? Are you purposely playing dumb? Do you think Cheney and Bush don't talk? Do you think Cheney did not pass on the info his office got from Wilson re. uranium sales? And how the hell can you compare a lie about sex with one that took a nation to war, got many people killed and is costing us a small fortune? Your hubris is impressive! Did you hear that Nancy Pelosi wants all American intelligence to be "more transparent." Why doesn't she just suggest that a regular bulletin be distributed to each and every American citizen so that we know exactly what is going on in the world of National and International fact finding....even when it involves classified information......to protect our civil rights? Its necessary to make our Intelligence more transparent when presidents turn it into spin and manipulate their country into war. And why didn't she suggest this when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory killing over 500 Iraqi citizens? After all we are entitled to know. Excuse me.......how do you compare bombing an aspirin factory with shock and awe? You're reaching badly! Wasn't that event based on erroneous information supplied by American intelligence, or was it really all just a "wag the dog" scheme to shift focus from possibly damaging testimony as some have suggested? Was Clinton stupid enough to take a nation to war over weak intelligence? No, it took Bush to pull that stunt. You people are so phoney and that fact just SHINES! Something STINKS where the sun don't SHINE and it has nothing to do with non conservatives!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next