<I don't like the fact that Clinton took advantage of a younger woman >
X, in international relations, it's not always clear who is taking advantage of whom. The primary test is whether the respective actions are manifestations of the persons' free wills or are made under pressure, duress, fear, threats, economic withdrawal, tariffs or other stress.
I think the younger woman, in that case, took advantage of a vulnerable man who she knew would be tempted by her flaunting of a thong wrapped around personal parts of her anatomy. She was in the controlling position, as women are when the male's money, strength, muscle and other powerful attributes are not in the equation. The poor sap's brain turns to mush.
If she'd kept her thong where it belonged, Bill's longing for a thonging would have done no wronging.
When the USA enters into free trade agreements or military activities, who is taking advantage of whom is sometimes more clear.
Mqurice |
