your opinion is somewhat less credible than numerous investigations, sorry
Considering the single source (Rabin) you cited to back up your statement and the numerous sources I cited to back up mine (includiong crew who were there), I find that somewhat amusing.
Those investigations were supposed to reach the conclusion they did. Had they not, Johnson would have had to take action against Israel. That would have pissed off the US Jewish Lobby, a rather powerful political group. Johnson was nothing if not a politician.
as far as I know but if you have the evidence to the contrary you may get a reward or, at least, a book out of i
The US gov't got a book out of it. Or, actually, a book-sized report. The SECOND investigation of the Kennedy assassination. Brought about by mounting public skepticism about the first; it was coming unraveled. The second did conclude that the first investigation was flawed and that there was credible evidence of more than one gunman.
they, actually, do
Source?
They do prohibit attacking unarmed lifeboats, though.
One of those sources I cited did describe that as a "war crime", remember? |
