SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RealMuLan who wrote (36144)7/17/2003 1:09:53 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
Yiwu, as usual, the idea that China can't also be rich stems from the idea that things will stay the same. It's possible to be really rich without owning an SUV and having enormous highways all over the place with traffic jams.

Individually occupied and rented superconductor maglev cars electronically controlled and moving at 200 kph would suit me much more than self-drive SUVs in traffic jams wolfing down tons of fuel a year and spending most of the time parked. All the Chinese and Indians and everyone else can own the swankiest cyberphones and biotech technology imaginable and it won't touch the environment or deplete resources.

Food of supercalifragilisticexpialidocious quality can be produced in multistorey [or single storey] biotech food factories without any spray, tractors and industrial age hard work.

Wealth is cheap to produce. There's plenty for everyone. In the meantime, we can all bid for whatever is in short supply. If Chinese have the money, they can have the goods. Heck, the USA even refuses to buy NZ goods such as sheep and steel, so China doesn't have much opposition in the auction. The USA has defaulted.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext