SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AK2004 who wrote (19480)7/20/2003 2:01:33 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) of 21614
 
About the only thing you've proved is that you're a lazy LPOS.

You haven't even gotten close to the post and nothing in the series of text that you've posted even mentions Israel.

Clearly your research skills are grossly inadequate. You wouldn't make a good lab rat let alone a researcher. How hard is it to click back to the original source? I can train a lab rat to do that. You can't manage to click back to the original source.

This is the post those answers trace back to...
Message 19125309
Specifically.

RE: Preventing distress signal is only possible by EMP
jttmab: Flat out wrong.

Followed by:http://www.siliconinvestor.com/msg_multireplies.gsp?msgid=19125309
LPOS:
re: Flat out wrong.
give me a "standard" jamming via noise and I'll tell you how to bypass.

Followed by: siliconinvestor.com
jttmab: Re: give me a "standard" jamming via noise and I'll tell you how to bypass.

I didn't say that it had to be jamming through noise. But besides that you're not going to do any real-time bypass on the tacical battlefield.

and so on....

-----------------

The original statement in the thread was your idiotic claim of Preventing distress signal is only possible by EMP

It had nothing to do with 1967 or the Israeli/Liberty incident. You made a generic claim that the only way to prevent a distress signal was by EMP...You were wrong then, you're wrong now and you're a LPOS.

jttmab
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext