Stop the War! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: AK2004 who wrote (19488)	7/20/2003 2:17:33 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) of 21614

jamming works as a tactical weapon to disrupt communication and/or certain targeting devices but by no means it can prevent ship from sending a distress signal. So jamming to prevent sending a distress signal back home or to close by US ships is a complete BS LPOS, that's BS, you can jam sufficiently to disrupt the communications while you're taking out the antennas with weapons fire and napalm. As long as your jamming power at the frequency of the distress signal exceeds the power of the transmitted signal you can reasonably jam the signal. So jamming to prevent sending a distress signal Since when does jamming prevent sending a distress signal? Didn't they cover than in your PE class? Jamming overlays noise over the transmitted signal so the signal can't be received. but it does not go well together with saving survivors Which survivors did they save? The dead ones? The Israeli even had to manufacture the speed that the Liberty was travelling at...they claimed they thought it was travelling at 30 knots; it wasn't and they eventually had to acknowledge it, but came up with BS that they thought it was at the time. jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next