What rubbish to compare North Korea to a child and the US as a parent dishing out discipline.
It doesn't have to just be children. It can be any personal relationship one is involved in.
It's not natural, nor healthy, for people to subjugate themselves to intimidation and threats. Nor is it conducive to building trust and rapport for two nations to enter in an agreement that one of them decides they don't have to abide by.
Would you permit a business client to treat you this way? To sign a contract and then renege on it, while using death threats and bluster against yourself and your friends in order to intimidate you into paying "protection" money to him?
Whether it be children, or adults, we all reward "good behavior" while punishing (or at least admonishing) bad.
We made a direct threat to an extremely dangerous and unstable regime that is both a nuclear power and a sleazy arms merchant -- one that is made more dangerous by virtue of teetering on the verge of collapse.
And that regime has been making threats against its southern neighbor and the rest of the region, while also engaging in criminal activities (drug smuggling, weapons proliferation) for decades. His father was just as bad as the son.. And any children he has will likely be the same way... So the cycle will never end.
But the question is whether his generals will permit their own positions of influence as leaders of the military to be destroyed by Kim's reckless brinksmanship. He could easily find himself the subject of a military coup, should he threaten their interests by risking the destruction of their army in a needless and unwinnable war.
Hitler was the same way... The more he was appeased, the bolder he became with his demands. First the Rhineland, then Austria, then Czechoslovakia, and eventually Danzig (Poland)... Each time the international community protested, but did nothing to stand up to him with the threat of military force.
One can only wonder how history would have been different had the world shown some spine and actively opposed Hitler's agenda during those formative years of the Nazi regime.
We can meet with the North Koreans and talk about.
Sure we can... along with the Chinese, Japanese, and S. Koreans (at a minimum). After all, these are the nations that actually will have to live with the repercussions of any US-N. Korean talks.
Multi-Lateralism is the preferred mechanism for dealing with regimes such as N. Korea's. It would have also be preferable with regard to Iraq, had it not been for the fact that two permanent members of the UNSC were on Saddam's "payroll", hoping to land VERY lucrative oil contracts, thus eliminating any chance of a multi-lateral approach.
Hawk |
