SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SYQUEST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (3660)8/6/1997 7:50:00 AM
From: Stephen Leung   of 7685
 
Suit revisited

If they were damn sure of winning, why would they throw in a frivolous patent name violation like JET. Any judge could not take the entire suit seriously if Iomega threw something like this in. This only serves to undermine Iomega's case.

Anyway, if there is clear patent violation then I think Iomega should be rewarded damages. If the suit proves false, Iomega should have to pay all legal costs plus damages to Syquest for tarnished reputation. I think this is a risky move on Iomega's part. They are not the underdog filing the suit like Digital/Intel or Apple/Microsoft.

Time will tell here. Another interesting subplot
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News