SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1854)7/22/2003 2:41:15 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) of 3143
 
though you did try to attribute the drug-dealers, fences and pimps to me earlier, I had nothing to do with that.

For one, you threatened to bring Jon Tara into your legal action by having his "real" identity exposed through court order. This has both inherent direct and veiled threats. The direct is merely to be brought into a legal action when there is no legal connection. The veiled threat is that if someone is connected, however remotely, to a legal action, that you will seek damages against them. Even with no connection, it requires that person to incur costs to protect themselves.

It will be very easy to come up with a couple more examples, do you want me to proceed showing how you use threats of legal action to stifle any challenges to you on this thread?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News