Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Alighieri who wrote (172364)	7/23/2003 9:20:54 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (4) of 1572965

Ritter, who was there practically from the start (let me remind you that you were not) has maintained firmly that the vast majority of the weapons were destroyed up until 1998. This is incorrect. The reason Ritter has been so heavily doubted is because he changed his story after he received the $400,000. Ritter's position in 1998, when the inspectors were denied access, was totally at odds with his position now. Furthermore, for eight full years during Clinton's administration Saddam was absolutely, unequivocally and easily contained. That has not been determined. It is clear that Dr. David Kay has significant news concerning WMD. Let's see what that news turns out to be. That's a lie and no reasonable person would argue with it. It is not a lie and if you were to re-read the news accounts of the last year you would recognize that essential aspects of the inspection (such as removal of personnel from the country) were not allowed. We disagree about all this. Your position is political. You don't like Bush so you color the facts as required to support your criticism.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next