Ritter's position in 1998, when the inspectors were denied access, was totally at odds with his position now.
Right..and bush's assertions only a few months ago are at odds with the truth alltogether. Point is that Ritter told us over and over again pre-invasion that there were no WMDs anymore...and his version is proving right.
That has not been determined.
No...it has been determined. No WMDs, no AlQueda links, no drones, and no scuds, etc....David Kay has a montain of paperwork he'll never be able to package into a credible story.
It is not a lie and if you were to re-read the news accounts of the last year you would recognize that essential aspects of the inspection (such as removal of personnel from the country) were not allowed.
You twist the facts again and evidence does not support your position. Scientists then refused to leave the country. Scientists today are free to talk and we have nothing....but a bucket of parts buried in someone's backyard for 10 years. Give me a lathe, a good machinist and two weeks. Is it that easy to build a nuke program and that easy to deceive the American people?
You don't like Bush so you color the facts as required to support your criticism.
True...I don't like bush, but it's not irrational, unfounded dislike. I don't like his foreign policies, his unilateralism, his deceipt on Iraq, dishonesty in Afghanistan, his tax policies, his record on the environment, and I certainly don't like the American image he has projected to the world....my dislike is rooted in tangibles.
Al |
