Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: lurqer who wrote (23262)	7/25/2003 12:57:45 AM
From: Sully-	of 89467

<font size=4>"In a televised address last October<font size=3> in which he sought to rally congressional support for a resolution authorizing war against Iraq, <font size=4>President Bush declared that the government of Saddam Hussein posed an immediate threat to the United States<font size=3> and outlined what he said was evidence pointing to its ongoing ties with Al-aida." President Bush NEVER said Iraq was an "IMMINENT THREAT". FACT:<font size=4> President Bush never said the words, "imminent threat" regarding Iraq, he chided those who would wait until the threat was imminent in the State of the Union Address. And President Bush did precisely the same thing when addressing the nation when discussing the Iraq threat. "Imminent threat" was born by democratic politicians & liberal media in response to the SOTUA. It was falsely attributed to President Bush & his Administration by liberal media & democratic politicians. Then it was used by the lieral left to make false accusations to scare voters & sway public opinion. <font size=5> See the irrefutable facts below........ ____________________________________________________________ October 7, 2002 President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat ...."Some ask how urgent this danger is to America and the world. The danger is already significant, and it only grows worse with time. If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?" ..... <font size=5> State of the Union Address<font size=3> whitehouse.gov <font size=5> ....Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.....<font size=3> whitehouse.gov

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next