SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (172585)7/25/2003 2:02:19 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1573984
 
What is wrong with you?

Hey, I'm simply correcting your errneous statements.

Then, you ARE claiming that people saw Clinton rape Juanita?

Again, you apparently don't understand the meaning of the word "witness".

Uh......nearly a year ago when you were alleging that Clinton had raped Monica. It wasn't until other conservatives on the thread pointed out the error of your thinking that you backed off that position.

I haven't backed off my position. I simply pointed out that when a man uses rohypnol to intoxicate a woman then sexually assault her, that power is well known to be an "intoxicant", and that Clinton's absuse of his power, effectively "intoxicating" Lewinsky, a near-teenager, it ought to be thought of as rape.

I stand by my statement. But I think Tim made a good argument against my statement. I still feel that what Clinton did to Lewinsky was tantamount to some kind of sexual assault. Call it rape, sexual assault, DWI, I don't care.

There is something wrong when the most powerful man in the world can sodomize a naive 22 year old and get away with it. The imbalance of power makes its flatly impossible, from a rational perspective, for her to have given consent.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext