SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (45491)7/31/2003 2:31:51 PM
From: Augustus Gloop  Read Replies (1) of 57110
 
100% agreed. To Blame Bush one has to ignore business cycles, market direction before he took office and the many transgressions of Corporate America that took place or started well before he was elected. Now I'd be a liar if I said that I thought Bush was doing a GREAT job with regard to the economy. However, he faces issues that no other president has faced in modern times. The combination of the above mentioned items and terrorism that took place in our national financial district coupled with the need for a response to those events are IMO unique from past economic problems. I guess one thing that bothers me is the whole idea of cutting checks after the fact like we did 2 years ago and are currently doing. I'm not sure thats the most efficient way to stimulate things. Personally I'd like to see a "FICA Holiday" period that would result in the same amount of money being distributed but the cost would be far less than printing and mailing checks. Hell....I don't know if it would work but thats what has been going through my mind as an alternative to cutting checks
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext