Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: D. Long who wrote (109232)	8/1/2003 9:32:45 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Derek, I wrote much the same thing yesterday. Stop stealing my material. <g> Seriously, NK is a classic case of multiple opinions and no clear best one. Why is multilateral talks better than bilateral? Beat me? And why are bi better than multi? Same answer. On one hand the problem is regional and calls for a regional solution--enter the other players. But on another level NK, by joining the nuke club, is a global concern and as we have seen, no other nation is willing to take action save the US. History may judge that war was the answer, years earlier and up to today. The other solution may be flat out appeasement. Buy their nuke program for the cost of a war (for argument sake 50 billion) and sign a non-aggression pact with NK. And since Kim is a movie buff, have Gore intervene with the Hollywoodstocracy and get Kim a role in the next Bond flick=="The Day 007 Died". That should solve all outstanding problems. One more thing--In the future "Let them build cars, not nukes". mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next