Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (71245)	8/1/2003 7:22:52 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) of 82486

But there's no reason why Bush, while he's in the process of defining marriage, has to single out homosexuals He didn't proactively single them out; he reacted to the homosexuals singling themselves out by pushing their agenda. If the man-boy love folks were pushing their agenda that hard and had gotten a ruling from the SC saying that government couldn't outlaw sex between adults and minors, I'm sure he would be speaking out on that. If the polygamists were pushing their agenda with marches and Hollywood star appearances and got a SC ruling that the government couldln't limit the rights of folks who wanted multiple-love relationships and there were suits in several States trying to establish that prohibitions on polygamy were unconstitutional under state constitutions, I'm sure he would be speaking out on that. Personally, if the homosexual bar to marriage is dropped, there is IMO no longer any justification for prohibiting polygamous marriage. And I'm sure you'll agree with that. Right?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next