SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (109479)8/3/2003 2:28:57 AM
From: KonKilo  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
The Bush administration did push WMDs/aid to terrorists, not wanting to give "slum clearance" as the real reason, for reasons that are pretty obvious to anyone who thinks about it. Now that lack of WMDs has proved an embarresment, it suits liberals to pretend that the reasons that were pushed were the only reasons, and that if they didn't pan out, there could have been no reasons at all. Some actually believe this, for others it's just a partisan stance.

Quite a fine piece of circular logic you have here, Nadine.

Let me see if I have this straight:
The Bushies couldn't tell us the real reason, so they gave us false reasons instead.
Some of the false reasons have been proven false, so they are now truly false but other false reasons must still be true since they've not yet been proven false.

It must be mentally exhausting to be a Neocon apologist.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News