SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MythMan who wrote (253892)8/4/2003 3:09:10 PM
From: Giordano Bruno  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
U.S. finds error in June construction spending data By Greg Robb
WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- The U.S. government said Monday that it has uncovered an error in the tabulation of the June construction spending report. Based on the correct information, the Commerce Department said construction on homes, hospitals and highways actually rose 0.3 percent in June to a $872.5 billion annual rate. This is stronger than the initial estimate released last Friday that construction spending was flat in the month. The closely-watched private-sector figure was unchanged at a $660.3 billion rate in June, up from the previous estimate of a 0.3 percent decline. Residential construction rose 0.1 percent at a $443 billion rate, up from the initial estimate of a 0.4 percent drop from May. Public construction was not revised. Government spending rose 1 percent to $212.2 billion. The overall June spending figure is 2.0 percent above the June 2002 level, up from the previous estimate of a 1.1 percent year-over-year increase, the department said. For the first 6 months of 2003, construction spending totaled $411.0 billion, 1.9 percent above the same period in 2002. This is stronger than the initial estimate of $409.3 billion, or 1.5 percent above the same period in 2002. The government did not disclose many details behind the incorrect data, only saying that it was caused by a "processing error."

Lol
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext