SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (71650)8/5/2003 12:40:07 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
So you do not think that society has a legitimate interest in promoting childbearing?

Only to the extent that it is necessary for the survival of the species. Society has a greater interest in turning out a high proportion of contributors from whatever offspring it produces. And it certainly has an interest in not producing more children than it can support.

Whether or not you agree with my view of that issue, you have to agree that it is not devoid of merit. It may or may not be a "better" perspective than yours as I playfully asserted earlier, but it in not clearly inferior. There is room on this earth for people believing each and practicing each, at least at this point and time, so there's no reason to insist that one of them be the rule. If the situation changes and necessity arises, then we can make a rule but we don't need one now. If we don't need a rule, then free choice and respect for the choices of others should reign. To do otherwise is suffocating.

if you have done someone wrong, you owe that person an apology as a matter of justice.

That's your view of the world. Everyone doesn't operate that way. You like it because it satisfies your sense of justice but other people have different ideas about justice. And different levels of affinity for rule structures.

Earlier today I said to you that no apology was expected. I was teasing you, of course, but if you said something hurtful to me, I guess you would feel you owed me one. Personally, I don't care for one. I'd rather not have one because that would be uncomfortable for me. So what do you do? Do you apologize because your sense of justice requires it or are you sensitive to my (the victim) wishes in the matter. Maybe, if you're going to have a rule, the rule should be that you make up for what you did in the way most agreeable to the victim.

My point in that example was not to make a further issue of your potentially hurtful comments but merely to provide a familiar example. Who cares if there's an apology as long as the parties are satisfied with the result? Rules for such as this are fine for teaching children, for adults they're too rigid. Adults should be sensitive to their own wrongdoing and sensitive to the needs of those they've hurt, from which data they can sort such things out on an ad hoc basis.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext