SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (4416)8/6/2003 4:28:22 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (3) of 793682
 
Nadine, you and I have had this conversation more times than either of us cares to recall. My position has always been that all things human have perspectives, frames, whatever. With good journalists those appear in the stories selected to treat, with some of the quotes, and with some of the adjectives. But those frames are in conflict with and always subordinate to getting the story right. The reason the NYTimes is vulnerable on the idiotic stuff the right is throwing at it is because it cares about getting the story right; and the reason the Washington Times and Fox are not is because they don't.

Rush is about as far away from caring about getting the story straight as one can get. He, obviously, like the rest of us, doesn't wish to be embarrased, so there are limits. But if he can get away with it, he certainly will.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News