SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Janice Shell who wrote (536)8/6/1997 6:01:00 PM
From: Rambi   of 71178
 
Concerned that I had criticized too quickly, I got out my trusty WriteSOurce 2000 (it's Sebranek/Meyer, UL, is that the one you don't like?) and found that "which refers to non-living objects or animals; never people, and that may refer to animals, people or nonliving objects.
Now could a case be made that in the critiqued sentence "authors" is a non-living word and is not directly a people word? Certainly some authors are dead. SOme write as if they were. SOme write as if they were animals. But I doubt that the teacher spent a great amount of time debating these points with herself or her compatriots.
I did wonder about the that... because, like you, I was taught not to use it in place of who...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext