Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (110303)	8/6/2003 11:11:41 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (3) of 281500

Thanks . Great photos of the buried Mig. Or Foxbat. Is that the one Eastwood stole? (g) Looking at the scene, a person could stand on a foot of dirt on top of a buried plastic barrel of chemicals and not be able to detect it with a metal detector. There can never be proof that Saddam did not bury the bios. I doubt if any of the found papers will say "We did not bury the Bios" But finding some would be proof, although we may not be able to compute exactly when they were buried unless someone talks. If no records were kept and nobody talks and no weapons are found, then the situation has to evaluated on the basis of a preponderance of evidence . Facts and evidence in UN reports , Intelligence reports, and past actions of Saddam which are all overwhelmingly in favor of a conclusion that Saddam did have WMD's and WMD programs of some form. Sig@nolies.com . .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next