Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bilow who wrote (110428)	8/7/2003 6:02:59 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (3) of 281500

Fox wanted desperately to take the US side, in the interests of improving relations in general, but he was unable to do so in the face of the arrogant way the neocons went about their excuse for 'diplomacy' on attacking Iraq, it was strictly their way or the highway on the matter, so Fox was forced to the highway ..... the bribes and the bullying out of DC at this time will remain legendary, and they turned against themselves some very basically pro-US players in México .... much the same was happening with Chile, even though the chilenos don't have the visceral opposition to invasion of one nation by another, having not been invadees near as much as the mexicanos Particularly amusing was one suggestion from some neocon apologist at the time, that México was succumbing to pressure from the french ..... well if this hack had only studied a little history he would have known how stupid that was, since in all its history México has had only two nations invade it - the US, and France [edit] - this just in, on the Bush Admin vs. Normal People case - #reply-19189260 ' "This is all about money and greed," said Bobby Rayburn '

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next