SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : IMP, Inc. (IMPX @ 7 1/8)A sympathy play with IOM??
IMPX 6.210+25.2%Oct 22 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Xavier who wrote (2470)8/6/1997 6:56:00 PM
From: rlev   of 2560
 
Xavier:

Sorry to hear this. I too have put large parts of my portfolio
into single stocks in the past ... I had to learned the hard way
not to do this. Even though I was forwarned form reading and others
I still needed to burn my hand to know it was hot. What I do now
is take my speculative funds and spread them out dollar wise among a
few promising ventures.

IMPX hit the roof as Son of Iomega. I couldn't see it then and
currently don't see this stock returning to the $20 level any
time soon. What I do see is IMPX being a triple or quad from these
levels once they get their act going.

I know it's hard to forget what you paid for a stock but you need
to evaluate your portfolio as it sits currently. Inother words
IMPX is no longer a large part of your porfolio.

Now we need to step back and re-evalute ...

At $1.5 is this a good investment to make? Your call. I'm keeping
my shares and I'm giving them % consideration that they are worth in
my portfolio (i.e. $1500 worth). I may even add to them to bring
this investment up to a reasonable level if I deem it's the right
thing to do ... i.e. if I feel the company is going to go really turn
profitable in the near future (which I'm sure everyone here is trying
to get a handle on).

Sorry for the lecture ... you didn't ask for it ... It just brought
back memorys: aapl@35.5 is only now comming back by holding it for
many years, should have dumped it many times over. symc@20 has only
now gone into the black ... and don't let me forget about CML@7.5 ...
couldn't possibly go lower. IMPX? didn't look before I leeped ... just plain stupidity following the crowd ... Each represents a
slightly different misstake and a learning experience which I try not
to repeat.

Hoping for a triple

-- Rich
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext