SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wallace Rivers who wrote (17532)8/7/2003 11:23:42 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (2) of 78984
 
Regarding Costco, we want to separate the business from the stock. Imo anyway.

The business is great from my customer perspective. I like the merchandise, food, prices, service, relatively quick checkout, free food tastings. Looks like others agree. My local stores are generally pretty busy it seems to me (and I try to shop off-hours).

Considering just the stock, I would try to categorize the stock as either a value stock or a growth stock. When I bought Sept.-Nov. of last year between $34 and $31, I considered it a growth stock.

Now I'll want to consider re-categorizing it. After price drop of past couple days, it's still no value stock. If it's a growth stock, it's a busted one. Sales are up, but earnings are now expected to be similar to last year ($1.48-$1.50 vs. $1.48, diluted,).

So I want to know if the earnings problem is systemic or readily fixed. Marketwatch says, "On a conference call with analysts, Costco said that half of its profit shortfall is the result of pricing skirmishes with Sam's Club, particularly in the high-margin commodities and drugs categories. Though the aggressiveness in cutting costs to consumers is just short of a pricing war, analysts worried that it could go on for some time." So it seems to me that some major issues hindering bottom line performance aren't going to go away.

I see COST still in an expansion mode (opening new stores), and I expect that COST's good management will somehow work through and resolve some of the issues that are hindering bottom line performance. COST had a drop in earnings from 2000 to 2001, and the company came back from that. So did its stock if one bought after the stock had abruptly dropped. I acknowledge that the stock price now is relatively high with a p/e of about 20. OTOH, in the past decade COST has sported a p/e that high or higher in most every year.

I'm holding on to my shares, and I'm considering adding a bit if COST drops a little more. I'd be guessing that the bad news is mostly out, and that with the passage of time, we'll see some improvement in bottom-line performance (in addition to continued same-store sales growth) and a recovery in the stock price.

Jmo, and I've been wrong many, many times

Paul Senior
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext