Well, everyone does not live nor think according the general US rules of the "the root of all evil", nor thinking dentist
I hope you noticed the global responces to both Reagan and Bush and "their evil" and especially that you domestically followed the story of the rise and fall of Newt the Gingrich, Hustler and all.
As matter of fact, the closest domestic translation is something like a tooth with a lot of cavities, or what that thumb says after the hammer hit it.
Did both Reagan and Bush have bad teeth, roots and all, and sore thumbs??
Victorian Cleanliness is even funnier, but then one has to get into the US religious right.
(however, I agree, US is not ready for standardized tests in school, wasn't in the 1972s and not yet today) --
Well, Clinton once said some words which pointed to some knowledge of of the rest of the world, but he, to my knowledge, never said anything publicly in terms of Lani. Howard Dean seem to be just frolicking around in the two-party system, but that is a must to get started. --
Well, I'm still waiting for that non-zero statistical murrican with at least the basic knowledge of the two/party system.
However, almost all of the top/leaders have used some keywords showing some skills, but very carefully.
Not even Bush demanded a two-party system for neither Afghanistan, Irak nor Palestinia.
<<I wonder if Bush will produce something similar for declassification in some 20-30-50 years??> The answer is probably yes. I doubt Bush will have any say at all about that. He will be long gone. >
The CSPAN-guest answer is a simple "no", US presidents have understood, thanks to Nixon, not to leave those documents behind, either edited or not.
---
Btw, CLinton complained about this one, becoming more like a nightmare
www2.acc.af.mil
However, he was, maybe, somebody brought up on Kelloggs, page 3
mum.org
Ilmarinen
Btw, our earlier speaker of the house did not become our president even after describing all the fun she and her husband had in their waterbed, something was missing, too conservative?? |