SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DavesM who wrote (440826)8/10/2003 4:11:44 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
Thinking there are only 2 ways to approach any problem is extremely narrow-minded and usually very stupid.
I have already outlined my view of what would have been a saner approach on SI.
Using areas of Iraq already out of saddam's sphere of influence an entity recognized as "Free Iraq" (or whatever name suits) could have been established. saddam's Iraq would no longer be recognized. Those areas could have grown, geographically, politically and economically in a way that would gradually reduce saddam's influence to 0 throughout Iraq.
It would have needed military protection...UN or otherwise.
Iraqis would have been encouraged to migrate to Free Iraq while at the same time Free Iraq would have gradually encompassed more of "saddam's Iraq.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News