SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : biotech binary events

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Biomaven who wrote (77)8/11/2003 9:50:08 AM
From: Icebrg  Read Replies (1) of 295
 
Peter

I believe we can "live" with a tail of 10 %. At the time of the presentation at ASCO there were still 83 survivors. If there is a tail of 10% in the placebo group (i.e. 15 persons), that would still leave 68 getting Neovastat. That is 45 % of the number of persons randomized to that group. And if that is indeed the case it appears as if the "drug" has some beneficial effect.

A question is of course at what percentage the levelling out starts. If it starts at 20 % the distribution would be 30 survivors from the placebo group and 53 from Neovastat group. 20 % against 35 %. Neovastat would still appear to give better odds.

{I will have to take a crash-course in statistics if I want to continue these speculations)

The situation is however complicated by the fact that the primary end-point is a 50 % improvement in the median survival time. Not time to progression or to death for the full group.

Erik
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext