Your official, public, personal definition of "anti-american", what was that??
In a proportional representations systems votes have a different meaning than in single-seat, winner-takes-all, FPTP (Farts Past the Post) elections.
Especially in multi-memember-districts
(party-list systems are kind of boring)
What matters, is that, just as the goal of the 1800s was to end colonialism (and slavery, for those who were late) the 1900s was to (ocne again, to end colonials for those who were late) and to introduce regular voting (and civil) rights, the 2000s are the time for those who very late in both earlier centuries, to introduce both
- proportional representation
- multi-party systems
- and especially, center-based-consensus-systems.
However, those too old two-party-citizens need not to worry, they are supposed to die peacefully, leaving those more difficult issues to new and brighter generations. (scandinavian ancient IQ-studies show that every two-party generation gets an additional bonus of 20 points when going multi-party)
Well, except if they think they have some responsibility and future for their grand-children, not just to make them laugh, or cry, on that Pavlovian Fart.
Btw, you can find those IQ-statistics in the back of that "Bell Curve" book, bless the good man, now a tru member of Cato (well, he might have been pushed out to the level of AEI??) |
