Well, we disagree on the facts of the case.
I do not believe Clinton used his office to "slander, oppress, brutalize, rape, and degrade women". The charge against him was lying about having consentual sex with ML. That was his crime. To accuse him of other unproven crimes is that same as those who accuse Bush of cocaine use, desertion, and paying hush money to a woman who aborted his baby.
Is it more of a scandal to have extramarital sex, and lie about it in court, than to lead the country to economic and international ruin? Because, that is the path that Bush is on if he is not very careful and somewhat lucky. I for one would rather have a President whose fault was a wandering eye, and the misjudgement to lie about it, than one that leads us to a path of ruin.
Clinton lying about Monica killed no foreign civilians in a as-yet-to-be-justified war, killed and maimed no US troops, lost no jobs, stifled no growth. |
